<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Dimuthu's Blog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dimuthu.org/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dimuthu.org</link>
	<description>Waiting for your comments</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2011 06:50:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on PHP Web Services &#8211; Authentication Based on Client&#8217;s IP by Mangal</title>
		<link>http://www.dimuthu.org/blog/2008/12/27/php-web-services-authentication-based-on-clients-ip/comment-page-1/#comment-109790</link>
		<dc:creator>Mangal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2011 06:50:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dimuthu.org/?p=862#comment-109790</guid>
		<description>Thank you, Dimuthu,

I am using PEAR::SOAP in our application that&#039;s why can&#039;t use your &quot;authentication by username token&quot;. if you have any other idea to secure PEAR::SOAP web-service then please update me. it will help me lot.

Thank you</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you, Dimuthu,</p>
<p>I am using PEAR::SOAP in our application that&#8217;s why can&#8217;t use your &#8220;authentication by username token&#8221;. if you have any other idea to secure PEAR::SOAP web-service then please update me. it will help me lot.</p>
<p>Thank you</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Authenticate using Username Token from PHP &#8211; 2 Minutes Introduction by dimuthu</title>
		<link>http://www.dimuthu.org/blog/2008/09/23/authenticate-using-username-token-from-php-2-minutes-introduction/comment-page-1/#comment-109781</link>
		<dc:creator>dimuthu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2011 06:15:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dimuthu.org/?p=372#comment-109781</guid>
		<description>Hi Bob,
Yea you have to install WSF/PHP PHP extension, http://wso2.org/downloads/wsf/php</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Bob,<br />
Yea you have to install WSF/PHP PHP extension, <a href="http://wso2.org/downloads/wsf/php" rel="nofollow">http://wso2.org/downloads/wsf/php</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on PHP Web Services &#8211; Authentication Based on Client&#8217;s IP by dimuthu</title>
		<link>http://www.dimuthu.org/blog/2008/12/27/php-web-services-authentication-based-on-clients-ip/comment-page-1/#comment-109780</link>
		<dc:creator>dimuthu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2011 06:14:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dimuthu.org/?p=862#comment-109780</guid>
		<description>Hi,
Sure. If apache access control is used, you can avoid IP spoofing attacks. If you are using WSF/PHP you can use username token, that would do authentication in application level with more control. See here, http://www.dimuthu.org/blog/2008/09/23/authenticate-using-username-token-from-php-2-minutes-introduction/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,<br />
Sure. If apache access control is used, you can avoid IP spoofing attacks. If you are using WSF/PHP you can use username token, that would do authentication in application level with more control. See here, <a href="http://www.dimuthu.org/blog/2008/09/23/authenticate-using-username-token-from-php-2-minutes-introduction/" rel="nofollow">http://www.dimuthu.org/blog/2008/09/23/authenticate-using-username-token-from-php-2-minutes-introduction/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on PHP Web Services &#8211; Authentication Based on Client&#8217;s IP by Mangal</title>
		<link>http://www.dimuthu.org/blog/2008/12/27/php-web-services-authentication-based-on-clients-ip/comment-page-1/#comment-109646</link>
		<dc:creator>Mangal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2011 14:05:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dimuthu.org/?p=862#comment-109646</guid>
		<description>Hi Dimuthu,

Thanks for writing the article.

Dimuthu, as Nabeel says that IP based authentication can be spoofed what happen if we restrict the access of our webservice by apache access control also. Is this add some more security?

Please suggest, i am waiting your reply.

Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Dimuthu,</p>
<p>Thanks for writing the article.</p>
<p>Dimuthu, as Nabeel says that IP based authentication can be spoofed what happen if we restrict the access of our webservice by apache access control also. Is this add some more security?</p>
<p>Please suggest, i am waiting your reply.</p>
<p>Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on XML Schema nillable=&#8221;true&#8221; vs minOccurs=&#8221;0&#8243; by RP</title>
		<link>http://www.dimuthu.org/blog/2008/08/18/xml-schema-nillabletrue-vs-minoccurs0/comment-page-1/#comment-103587</link>
		<dc:creator>RP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2011 17:20:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dimuthu.org/?p=187#comment-103587</guid>
		<description>Very Nice article. It is explained very well. Thanks for sharing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very Nice article. It is explained very well. Thanks for sharing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on WSDL2PHP 2 Minutes Introduction by qalhat</title>
		<link>http://www.dimuthu.org/blog/2008/09/21/wsdl2php-2-minutes-introduction/comment-page-1/#comment-100835</link>
		<dc:creator>qalhat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2011 20:25:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dimuthu.org/?p=349#comment-100835</guid>
		<description>@swadams

I faced same issue installing wsdl2php using pear (caused by another installation of php on my laptop), I fixed it by specifying the full path to pear on my working php installion:

# /usr/local/Zend/Core/bin/pear install wsdl2php-0.2.1-pear.tgz</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@swadams</p>
<p>I faced same issue installing wsdl2php using pear (caused by another installation of php on my laptop), I fixed it by specifying the full path to pear on my working php installion:</p>
<p># /usr/local/Zend/Core/bin/pear install wsdl2php-0.2.1-pear.tgz</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on XML Schema nillable=&#8221;true&#8221; vs minOccurs=&#8221;0&#8243; by XSD date types with minOccurs set to 0 now has a value of &#34;&#60;xml-fragment&#8230;&#34; (nillable defaults to false)</title>
		<link>http://www.dimuthu.org/blog/2008/08/18/xml-schema-nillabletrue-vs-minoccurs0/comment-page-1/#comment-100251</link>
		<dc:creator>XSD date types with minOccurs set to 0 now has a value of &#34;&#60;xml-fragment&#8230;&#34; (nillable defaults to false)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Oct 2011 11:20:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dimuthu.org/?p=187#comment-100251</guid>
		<description>[...] http://www.dimuthu.org/blog/2008/08/18/xml-schema-nillabletrue-vs-minoccurs0/ [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] <a href="http://www.dimuthu.org/blog/2008/08/18/xml-schema-nillabletrue-vs-minoccurs0/" rel="nofollow">http://www.dimuthu.org/blog/2008/08/18/xml-schema-nillabletrue-vs-minoccurs0/</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on XML Schema nillable=&#8221;true&#8221; vs minOccurs=&#8221;0&#8243; by XSD date types with minOccurs set to 0 now has a value of &#34;&#60;xml-fragment&#8230;&#34; (nillable defaults to false) &#124; Gravity Layouts</title>
		<link>http://www.dimuthu.org/blog/2008/08/18/xml-schema-nillabletrue-vs-minoccurs0/comment-page-1/#comment-98089</link>
		<dc:creator>XSD date types with minOccurs set to 0 now has a value of &#34;&#60;xml-fragment&#8230;&#34; (nillable defaults to false) &#124; Gravity Layouts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Oct 2011 13:03:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dimuthu.org/?p=187#comment-98089</guid>
		<description>[...] http://www.dimuthu.org/blog/2008/08/18/xml-schema-nillabletrue-vs-minoccurs0/ [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] <a href="http://www.dimuthu.org/blog/2008/08/18/xml-schema-nillabletrue-vs-minoccurs0/" rel="nofollow">http://www.dimuthu.org/blog/2008/08/18/xml-schema-nillabletrue-vs-minoccurs0/</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on XML Schema nillable=&#8221;true&#8221; vs minOccurs=&#8221;0&#8243; by JR</title>
		<link>http://www.dimuthu.org/blog/2008/08/18/xml-schema-nillabletrue-vs-minoccurs0/comment-page-1/#comment-93757</link>
		<dc:creator>JR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Sep 2011 13:47:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dimuthu.org/?p=187#comment-93757</guid>
		<description>Nice article explaining this subject. I would add to this a discussion of the &quot;default&quot; attribute since for some types (numeric values in particular) this could eliminate confusion if the business rules allow for a default value.
BTW, the intent of the sample XML matches the schema, however 4 of the elements - nonboth, nilint, minzero and minzeronil - are not closed correctly and would not be considered well formed.
@G - I believe you can decorate your service method with an attribute defining those conditions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice article explaining this subject. I would add to this a discussion of the &#8220;default&#8221; attribute since for some types (numeric values in particular) this could eliminate confusion if the business rules allow for a default value.<br />
BTW, the intent of the sample XML matches the schema, however 4 of the elements &#8211; nonboth, nilint, minzero and minzeronil &#8211; are not closed correctly and would not be considered well formed.<br />
@G &#8211; I believe you can decorate your service method with an attribute defining those conditions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on XML Schema nillable=&#8221;true&#8221; vs minOccurs=&#8221;0&#8243; by Rangalal Gamage</title>
		<link>http://www.dimuthu.org/blog/2008/08/18/xml-schema-nillabletrue-vs-minoccurs0/comment-page-1/#comment-89472</link>
		<dc:creator>Rangalal Gamage</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Aug 2011 06:39:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dimuthu.org/?p=187#comment-89472</guid>
		<description>Short &amp; Sweet Article which helps me to solve WSDL level validations.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Short &amp; Sweet Article which helps me to solve WSDL level validations.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

